🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to submit the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils could only create a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently spent years building local support and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, stating communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create other types of electoral districts – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.